Actually a post “Learning to Learn” by Evan Durant inspired me to write this. This topic has always intrigued me and have read my share blogs posts, books to satisfy my curiosity. I would like to share my experiences and experiments on this process and learn what others have done. I will briefly explain my philosophy and tools to slay this dragon!
The Philosophy of Learning:
Learning is not possible unless there is creative tension. Imagine a place where everyone agrees, they will never learn new things and grow. For this to be possible you need the right people and right environment. Right people are the one who questions the status quo and are not afraid constructive criticism. This is a tough team to have they will always keep you on your toes. The environment or conditions that will lead to learning are explained more in detail in my post “The 8 Fold Path”. This is just my opinion but I believe most learning system will be composed of one or more similar building blocks.
The Tools:
Task Standard work & Leader Standard Work: We need to be able capture knowledge at process level and then link it to peoples tasks. The combination of task and leader standard work helps to achieve this. We had started to use this tools out of necessity for standardizing our tasks but learned it can be a effective learning tool when a new person joins a team or even for cross training. Task Standard work ensures all the tasks required to sustain a process are understood and captured thus providing reference point for future improvements. Leader Standard work ensures these tasks are performed by responsible individuals.In case of new person or cross training leader standard work helps the individual to do things religiously on daily basis till becomes a habit that helps him/her to do the job. The right habits helps develop right culture. Thus these tools if used properly can used to help people learn the culture of the organization. They are also good catch-ball mechanisms between the trainer and trainee.
More reading: “Leader Standard Work” , “Task Standard Work”
Gemba Walk: This is yet another catch-ball mechanism and very effective to get whole people on the team to align their thoughts and understanding. We cannot transfer what is there in our mind to somebody else’s in an instant. We have to reinforce the idea again and again and how it implies in different scenarios till the other person understands its application and corrects any misunderstanding under the observation of the trainer. Every time the learner makes mistake the trainer is there to correct his path and realign their understanding. Several iterations of this during the gemba walks helps everyone to learn and align their ideas.
A3 Problem Solving: This is by far the most effective tool in teaching problem solving. It forces the learner to go through the PDCA cycle helping him to learn the systematic problem solving using scientific method. Second, the catch-ball mechanism by which I mean every time the learner proposes a solution the trainer can send it back asking for necessary fixes, and this cycle can go on till the best solution is reached.
Internal Training : We used to have weekly 30 min training for all the managers where anyone propose a training topic and present it. Mostly it would be one point lessons and sometimes games to show how one piece flow is better than batch. It was a fun way to learn and also a good opportunity for new managers to learn the skills of teaching in a safe environment.
Whatever you decide is your philosophy of learning or your tools, always remember to standardize the learning process so that any ineffective processes or steps can be improved or eliminated. We cannot learn the learning process without knowing what it is.
Hi Vivek,
I’m pleased that my post got you thinking, and I like your ideas about standardizing the learning process. I’ve been finding lately that a more disciplined application of PDCA in my everyday work has helped my own learning process tremendously.
For example, I now try to clearly express (and even write down) my expectation before taking any major actions. If I do “A”, then I expect “B”. Anytime I don’t get “B”, then I not only recognize an abnormality, but it also gives me a chance to figure out what in my thinking made me believe that “B” would happen. This approach is providing some great insights into how I learn and understand things around me.
Keep learning!
Evan
Hello Evan,
I completely agree about your thoughts on how disciplined approach leads to self-development.
In my opinion personal development is a by product and also a necessity of any change process. We cannot change the systems if we are not able to change ourselves.
Its wonderful that learning is perpetual, that means there are lot more interesting discoveries to be made!
Vivek
Evan: I really appreciate your insight on this topic. You’ve helped support what I believed to be a fact with our team’s transformation and gave me some excellent ideas on how to continue to propogate the problem solving culture we’re seeking. Thanks for the input and I look forward to the next gold nugget you have to offer! Cheers!